The performance aspects of the Polaris General XP and Can-Am Commander XTP
Engine & Drivetrain:
Both utilize 100-horsepower engines, but there may be slight differences in power delivery depending on specific engine characteristics (e.g., torque curves). Consider researching independent dyno tests to see if there are any significant performance gaps between the two. Neither offers a significant power advantage over the other.
Breakover Angle & Rock Crawling:
The Commander XTP's longer wheelbase can hinder its breakover angle, meaning it might bottom out more often on steep inclines or uneven terrain compared to the General XP. This can be crucial for rock crawling enthusiasts who require maximum maneuverability over obstacles. If rock crawling is a primary activity, the General XP's shorter wheelbase might be a significant advantage.
Weight Distribution & Handling:
While the weight difference is minimal, a slight variation in weight distribution can affect handling characteristics, particularly on tight trails or off-camber situations. Research or test drive both machines to see if you notice a difference in handling that sways your preference.
Aftermarket Performance Options:
Both machines have established aftermarket support, allowing for performance upgrades like turbo kits, exhaust systems, or clutch modifications. If extensive performance customization is important, consider which platform offers a wider range of aftermarket options that suit your needs.
Overall Performance:
For most riders, the 100-horsepower engines will provide ample power for typical utility tasks and recreational riding. The deciding factor likely lies in how the machines handle specific situations: rock crawling (General XP) or overall handling preference (subjective).
Look for reviews or comparisons that mention real-world performance experiences with both machines. Consider the type of terrain you'll be riding on most frequently. This can influence which machine's performance aspects are most important to you.
The suspension systems of the Polaris General XP and Can-Am Commander XTP
Shock Absorbers:
General XP: Walker Evans Velocity shocks. These are well-regarded shocks known for durability and good performance for recreational riding.
The 2-seater model may not have adjustable shocks, while the 4-seater model likely has adjustable options for preload and compression damping.
Commander XTP: Fox Podium QS3 shocks. These are high-performance shocks known for excellent control and damping, especially at higher speeds.
All XTP models (both 2-seater and 4-seater) come with piggyback shocks that offer increased oil capacity for better heat dissipation during demanding rides.
Suspension Design:
- General XP: Dual A-arm suspension in both the front and rear. This is a proven design that offers good overall handling and stability.
- Commander XTP: Dual A-arm suspension in the front, but Torsional Trailing Arm (TTa) suspension in the rear.
- The TTa suspension aims to combine the articulation benefits of a trailing arm design with the stability of a A-arm design.
- In theory, the TTa can provide a smoother ride over rough terrain and potentially better handling on corners.
- However, some riders might find the TTa's handling a bit less predictable compared to the traditional A-arm setup.
- The TTa suspension aims to combine the articulation benefits of a trailing arm design with the stability of a A-arm design.
Travel & Ground Clearance:
Both machines offer 14 inches of travel in the front and rear suspension, which is a good amount for recreational riding and light off-roading. Both have a ground clearance of 13.5 inches, allowing them to tackle moderate obstacles without scraping.
Choosing Between the Suspensions:
If you prioritize a plush ride over rough terrain and predictable handling, the Fox Podium QS3 shocks on the Commander XTP might be a better choice.
If you prefer a simpler, proven design and don't necessarily need the most high-performance shocks, the Walker Evans Velocity shocks on the General XP could be sufficient.Consider whether adjustability in the shocks is important to you (might be available on the 4-seater General XP).
If you're unsure about the TTa suspension, researching user reviews or test driving both machines can help you decide if its handling characteristics suit your preference.
Upgrading shock absorbers later is possible on both machines, allowing you to personalize the ride quality to your liking.
Look for reviews or comparisons that discuss the real-world experience with the suspension systems of both machines on various terrains.
The versatility aspects of the Polaris General XP and Can-Am Commander XTP
Cargo Capacity and Towing:
Both machines have a payload capacity of 600 lbs, which is enough to haul most gear and supplies needed for camping, hunting, fishing, or other outdoor activities. The Commander XTP boasts a higher towing capacity of 2,000 lbs, compared to the General XP's 1,500 lbs. This can be a significant advantage if you frequently tow heavy trailers or equipment.
If towing heavy loads is a regular need, the Commander XTP's extra towing capacity might be a deciding factor.
Dumping Cargo Bed:
Both UTVs come with dumping cargo beds, making it easier to unload loose materials like mulch, firewood, or dirt. This is a convenient feature for various utility tasks around your property or job site.
Passenger Capacity:
Both offer two-seater and four-seater configurations. Choose the option that best suits your typical riding needs and passenger requirements.
Comfort and Amenities:
The General XP might offer a slight edge in in-cab storage compartments, depending on the specific trim level. This can be handy for keeping tools, snacks, or other essentials within reach.
However, some reviewers suggest that the Commander XTP has more comfortable seats, especially for longer rides. This can be a subjective factor, so ideally, you'd test drive both machines to see which feels more comfortable for you and your passengers.
Winch Compatibility:
Both machines are winch-compatible, allowing you to add a winch for self-recovery or assisting others stuck in mud or difficult terrain.
Overall Versatility:
Both the General XP and Commander XTP are highly versatile UTVs capable of handling various tasks and recreational activities.
The Commander XTP takes the lead in towing capacity, making it a better choice for frequent heavy-duty hauling. The General XP might have a slight edge in in-cab storage, while the Commander XTP might offer more comfortable seating (subjective).
Consider the types of activities you'll be using the UTV for most often. This will help you determine which versatility features are most important to you. Think about whether you typically ride with passengers and how much cargo space you'll need.
Research aftermarket accessories available for each machine, as they can further enhance their versatility for specific tasks.
The value proposition for the Polaris General XP and Can-Am Commander XTP
Price:
The General XP has a higher starting price point than the Commander XTP (around $1,000 more for the two-seater models). However, the General XP often comes with more features included in the base price, such as a Ride Command infotainment system (depending on trim level).
The Commander XTP might require adding accessories like a sound system or GPS separately, which can increase the overall cost.
Features:
Consider the features most important to you and compare what's included in the base price of each machine. The General XP might offer features like Ride Command, a winch, or a more premium sound system that the Commander XTP might lack in its base trim.
If these features are important, the higher starting price of the General XP might be offset by the value of the included features.
Aftermarket Support:
Both machines have strong aftermarket support, allowing you to customize them with various accessories and performance upgrades.
However, some aftermarket parts might be more readily available or affordable for one platform over the other. Research what aftermarket options are most important to you and compare availability and pricing.
Total Cost of Ownership:
Consider not just the initial purchase price but also factors like maintenance costs, fuel efficiency, and warranty coverage. Research these aspects for both machines to get a better idea of the total ownership cost over time.
Value Proposition:
The General XP offers a higher base price with more features included, potentially justifying the cost for those who value convenience and factory-installed options.
The Commander XTP offers a lower entry point and allows for customization through aftermarket parts, potentially appealing to budget-conscious buyers who prefer building their ideal UTV.
Choosing Based on Value:
If having the latest features and technology is a priority, the General XP might be worth the higher price tag.
If you prioritize affordability and enjoy customizing your machine, the Commander XTP could be a better value option.
Look for deals and incentives offered by dealerships on both machines. Consider the long-term value proposition. While the Commander XTP might be cheaper upfront, the General XP's included features might save you money on aftermarket add-ons in the long run.
Ultimately, the best value depends on your individual needs, priorities, and budget.
Conclusion
These are closely matched machines. The Commander XTP is a better choice if you prioritize a lower price point. The General XP is a better choice if you value factory-installed features like Ride Command.
Comments
Post a Comment